Digambar Pandurang Suryawanshi v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Principle, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CRI.WP133-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 133/2015
(DIGAMBAR PANDURANG SURYAWANSHI (API) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Shri P.K. Sathianathan, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Patil, A.P.P. for the R-1.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.
TH : 13 DECEMBER, 2021 .
D ATED
The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. No costs.
APTE
Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:13.12.2021 17:01
DIGAMBAR PANDURANG SURYAWANSHI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. S. CHANDURKAR
G.A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court