IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Applications for amendment of pleadings allowed to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP889-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 889/2016
(DINESHKUMAR GOKULANAND JOSHI VERSUS THE SANT GADGEBABA AMRAVATI UNIVERSITY, AMRAVATI & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Shri R.M. Bhangde, counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.N. Badhe, counsel for the R-1 and 2.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.
TH : 13 DECEMBER, 2021 .
D ATED
Perused contents of C.A.W. Nos.155/2021 and 186/2021. The amendments prayed for are based on subsequent events. Though the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 opposes the prayers, considering the fact that the amendments as prayed are based on subsequent events, the applications are allowed. The amendment be carried out within two weeks.
It is open for the respondents to file additional affidavit opposing the amended pleadings.
The civil applications are disposed of.
(G.A. SANAP, J.) ( A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
APTE
Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:14.12.2021 11:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether civil applications for amendment of pleadings based on subsequent events should be allowed despite respondent opposition.
DINESHKUMAR GOKULANAND JOSHI
THE SANT GADGEBABA AMRAVATI UNIVERSITY, AMRAVATI
OTHERS
A. S. CHANDURKAR
G.A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
