Disposed

Tirupati Baburao Tidke and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC11 Oct 2021WP/8632/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged denial of old pension scheme benefits. Court directed the Corporation to forward application to State Government with recommendations within six weeks for a decision within six months.

What did the court decide?

Corporation to forward petitioners' application with recommendations to State Government within six weeks; State to decide within six months.

Tirupati Baburao Tidke and Others Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 126-wp 8632-2021.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 8632 OF 2021

¶4

Tirupati Baburao Tidke
and others

¶5

.. Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and another

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Sharad V. Natu, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

¶10

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

¶11

 DATED : 11th October, 2021.

¶12

PER COURT:-

¶13

.We have heard Mr. Natu, learned counsel for the petitioners. The
learned counsel submits that the petitioners have given representation
to the respondents for considering them by the old pension scheme.
The Corporation be directed to forward the same to the Government.

¶14

2.Mr. Narwadkar, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits

¶15

that, in view of the Government Resolution of 2005 the stand of the
Corporation is that the petitioners may not be entitled for the said
benefit.

¶16

1 of 2

¶17

2 126-wp 8632-2021.odt

¶18

3.The Corporation may forward the application of the petitioners
(page No. 46) to the State Government along with its
recommendations/notings, expeditiously and preferably within a
period of six (06) weeks from today. The State Government may take
decision upon the same on its own merits, in accordance with law and
policy, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months
thereafter.

¶19

4. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶20

( R. N. LADDHA )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶21

P.S.B.

¶22

2 of 2

Tirupati Baburao Tidke and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tirupati Baburao Tidke and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sham Govind Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kanak Sanjay Fatwani Vs the Union of India and Others

Ravindra Ganpat Baviskar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shri. Chatrapati Shivaji Shikshan Sanstha Karanjkalla through Its Chairman Vs Vandana Krishna

Madhukar Sadashiv Malode Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Alkadevi Laxmanrao Adhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others