The writ petition was disposed of without adverting to the merit because the A.G.P. submitted that the petitioner has a remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Liberty was granted to approach the alternate forum.
Liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1028 WRIT PETITION NO.9093 OF 2021
SHAM GOVIND SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Aghav h/f. Mr. P.K. Wagh
AGP for Respondents State : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 08/10/2021.
PER COURT :
. We have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner.2. The learned A.G.P. submits that the petitioner has
remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
3. In view of that, the writ petition is disposed of with
liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy.
4. In that event, all the contentions are kept open.
[ R.N. LADDHA, J. ]
[S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
ssc/
SHAM GOVIND SHINDE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court