Petitioner complained of non-implementation of Virasat proceedings regarding land records. Court advised approaching the State Committee constituted under a 2015 circular.
Petitioner advised to approach the State Committee constituted under Circular dated 13.02.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
951-wp-8509-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
951 WRIT PETITION NO.8509 OF 2021
SHREE PRABHAKAR RAMCHANDRA DIXIT..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Gaurav L. Deshpande, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, AGP for Respondents-State.
… CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 06th AUGUST, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.The grievance of the petitioner is that,
though Virasat proceedings are decided in favour of
the petitioner, the same are not implemented.
2.According to the learned counsel the same
are not implemented, as the name of the petitioner
is not recorded in the revenue record in respect of
the property in three villages.
3.In such an eventuality, the Committee is
constituted by the State under Circular dated
13.02.2015. The petitioner may approach the
Committee. The Committee would consider the same
and take appropriate steps.
4.With these observations, writ petition is
disposed of. No costs.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/August-2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shree Prabhakar Ramchandra Dixit
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court