Petitioner withdrew writ petition regarding pension settlement; court disposed of petition without costs as grievance was redressed.
No order as to costs; no other relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
22wp836o17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.836 OF 2017
BHAUSAHEB VITTHAL SUSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Kakade Amol N . AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Smt.M.A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondents 3 and 4 : Shri V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J.
&
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 14th JUNE, 2021
PER COURT:-
and he is in receipt of pension and other retiral benefits, Shri Kakade, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that he is not willing to proceed with this writ petition any further.
petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
kps
Bhausheb Vitthal Suse
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
