Devidas Sukdeo Ghate v. Harshida Devidas Ghate
Case brief
What is this about?
A review application filed by a husband challenging the maintenance order in W.P. No. 6859/2018 was rejected. The court observed that the applicant failed to deposit the awarded maintenance arrears and no ground under Lily Thomas was made out for revision.
What did the court decide?
Review application rejected with costs of Rs. 5,000 to be deposited before the Trial Court.
What the court decided
1
910ra14o21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO.14 OF 2021
IN WP/6859/2018
DEVIDAS SUKDEO GHATE
VERSUS
HARSHIDA DEVIDAS GHATE
Advocate for the Applicant : Shri Patil Vijay Y.
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 05th March, 2021
Per Court:
- This Review Application was filed by the applicant/ husband on 19.03.2020 for seeking review of the order passed by this Court on 07.03.2020 in Writ Petition No.6859/2018.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the principles laid down in Lily Thomas vs. Union of India apply to justify reviewing an order regarding maintenance.
Whether the applicant is justified in filing a review application given the non-deposit of the awarded maintenance amount.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DEVIDAS SUKDEO GHATE
- respondent
HARSHIDA DEVIDAS GHATE
Coram
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Bapusaheb Rambhaji Khemnar Vs Parner Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Ahmednagar and Another
Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation Ahmednagar through Its Commissioner Vs Suresh Kondiba Ithape
Parbhani City Municipal Corporation through Deputy Commissioner Vs Sopan Purbhaji Chopade
Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Shirdi Dist Ahmednagar through Administrator and Anothers Vs the State of Maharshtra and Anothers