The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Branch, allowed the applicant's prayer for impleadment of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation as an additional respondent in a public interest litigation matter without costs.
Allow the prayer for impleadment of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation as additional respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5345 OF 2021 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 47 OF 2021
Syed Imtiaz Jaleel ... Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents
Mr. Syed Imtiaz Jaleel, applicant-in-person Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for respondent – State Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondent no. 13 and 14 Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for Aurangabad Municipal Corporation
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ
AND
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE : JUNE 14, 2021
PC :
petitioner, seeking impleadment of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation as an additional respondent.
Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar waives service of notice for respondent – Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. The Civil Application stands disposed of, without costs.
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
arp/
Syed Imtiaz Jaleel
The State of Maharashtra
Aurangabad Municipal Corporation
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
