Applicants sought leave to withdraw a quashing petition to file an application on merits regarding the FIR/charge sheet; the court disposed of the application subject to liberty.
The application is disposed of subject to liberty to reinstate with a fresh application on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
9.APL-322-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2018
Minaz Daud Shaikh and others …. Applicants Versus Waseemudin Shah Fazluddin Shah and others …. Respondents
Mr. Sharif Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for the Respondent – State. Ms. Kritika Agarwal, Advocate for orig. complainant.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 07 OCTOBER 2021
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Applicants states that considering the nature of the offences narrated in the First Information Report, the First Information Report/charge-sheet will have to be challenged on merits and seeks leave to withdraw the Petition to file an Application/Petition for quashing the First Information Report/charge-sheet on merits.
With this liberty, the Application is disposed of.
PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2021.10.08 14:41:03 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
1 / 1
Minaz Daud Shaikh and others
Waseemudin Shah Fazluddin Shah and others
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court