Court disposed of a writ petition regarding early disposal of an appeal against an order of externment. It declined to direct early disposal to avoid prejudicing other pending appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
80.WP 3535.21.doc
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3535 OF 2021
Mahendra Ravindra Waghmare … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Anish Khandekar for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 8 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner restricts his prayer to the early disposal of the Appeal against the order of externment. To a query to the learned APP as to how many Appeals are pending, the learned APP placed before us the communication from the Deputy Commissioner, Pune wherein he has stated that 51 Appeals of the year 2020 and 115 Appeals of the year 2021 are pending and for some time because of the Pandemic, the hearings were suspended.
80.WP 3535.21.doc
2
3. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed JYOTI by JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2021.10.13 11:31:34 +0530
Mahendra Ravindra Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
