Dismissed

Ambika Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Bhagwat Keshelal Pardeshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC16 Jul 2021WP/6756/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of multiple writ petitions challenging tender processes by Zilla Parishad, Stayed by the Hon'ble Minister. The court held it was improper to entertain the petitions as the grievance lies with the Minister.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of. No costs. Contentions of parties kept open.

Ambika Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

(1)

¶2

913-wp-6715-2021 & ors.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

913 WRIT PETITION NO.6715 OF 2021

¶5

THE FISHERMAN CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD THR ITS
CHAIRMAN..PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶8

...

¶9

Mr. Manoj U. Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. Laxman H. Kawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3
to 5.

¶10

...

¶11

AND

¶12

1064 WRIT PETITION NO.6674 OF 2021

¶13

SUPER MACHIMAR VYAVASAIK SHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT
GHATNANDUR THR ITS CHAIRMAN ABDUL SAMAD GANISAB

¶14

..PETITIONER

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶17

...

¶18

Mr. Manoj U. Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. G. Borade, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent
Nos.3 to 5.

¶19

...

¶20

AND

¶21

1070 WRIT PETITION NO.6756 OF 2021

¶22

AMBIKA MATSYA VYAVSAIK SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT THR
ITS CHAIRMAN BHAGWAT KESHELAL PARDESHI

¶23

..PETITIONER

¶24

VERSUS

¶25

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶26

(2)

¶27

913-wp-6715-2021 & ors.

¶28

AND

¶29

1071 WRIT PETITION NO.6757 OF 2021

¶30

JAY KISAN MATSYA VYAVASAY AHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT
MADALMOHI THR ITS CHAIRMAN..PETITIONER

¶31

VERSUS

¶32

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶33

AND

¶34

1072 WRIT PETITION NO.6758 OF 2021

¶35

RAJGURU MATSYA VYAVSAY SAHKARI SANSTHA NATHAPUR THR
ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS..PETITIONERS

¶36

VERSUS

¶37

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶38

...

¶39

Mr. Manoj U. Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. Laxman H. Kawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3
to 5.

¶40

AND

¶41

1073 WRIT PETITION NO.6798 OF 2021

¶42

HANUMAN MACHIMAR SAHAKARI ANSTHA MARYADIT THR ITS
CHAIRMAN..PETITIONER

¶43

VERSUS

¶44

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶45

AND

¶46

1074 WRIT PETITION NO.6799 OF 2021

¶47

JAY BHAVANI SAHAKARI MACCH VYAVSAIK SANSTHA
MARYADITWADWANI THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶48

..PETITIONERS

¶49

VERSUS

¶50

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶51

(3)

¶52

913-wp-6715-2021 & ors.

¶53

...

¶54

Mr. Manoj U. Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. G. Borade, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent
Nos.3 to 5.

¶55

 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
 R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

¶56

 DATED : 16th JULY, 2021.

¶57

PER COURT:-

¶58

1.Mr. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for Zilla
Parishad submits that the Hon’ble Minister has
stayed the tender process undertaken by the Zilla
Parishad, Beed. The report is directed to be
given.

¶59

2.We have heard Mr. Shelke, learned counsel
for petitioners also.

¶60

3.In light of the fact that, the Hon’ble
Minister has taken cognizance of the tender process
and has granted stay to it, it would be improper to
entertain the petitions.

¶61

4.As stay to the tender process is already
granted, the petitioners, if they so choose, may
approach the Hon’ble Minister with their grievance.

¶62

5.In case, orders are passed by the Hon’ble
Minister adverse to the interest of petitioners,
petitioners may agitate afresh about their rights.

¶63

(4)

¶64

913-wp-6715-2021 & ors.

¶65

6.In that event, all contentions of parties
are kept open.

¶66

7.Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶67

 (R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶68

Devendra/July-2021

Ambika Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Bhagwat Keshelal Pardeshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambika Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Bhagwat Keshelal Pardeshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammadiya Educaton Societys through Its Secretary Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Karbhari Bhima Vaidya and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dhananjay Subhash Kulkarni Vs the Union of India and Another

Dnyanoda Bhagwat Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Snehal Ravindra Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Digambar Lingram Pentewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another