In a civil application within a writ petition, the Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed the addition of a proposed respondent no. 5 upon waiver of notice and disposed of the application.
Civil application for addition of respondent no. 5 allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1044-ca-3790-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3790 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.11948 OF 2019
KUM. SNEHAL D/O RAVINDRA THAKUR..APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the
Applicant.
Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 16th JULY, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.At the request of Mr. Golegaonkar, learned
counsel leave to add proposed respondent no.5.
2.Mr. Choudhari, learned counsel waives
notice for added respondent no.5.
3.Considering the gamut of the dispute,
civil application for addition of party is allowed.
4.Civil Application is disposed of.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/July-2021
Kum. Snehal D/o Ravindra Thakur
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court