Disposed

Bhiva Onkar Wagh v. the Tahsildar and Others

Bombay HC15 Dec 2021WP/6776/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order in a writ petition directed the petitioner to deposit measurement fees within 15 days to enable the measurement of specific land Guts. The court informed the petitioner that merits were not considered and reserved the right to pursue appropriate proceedings thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay measurement fees within 15 days; measurement to be carried out thereafter.

Bhiva Onkar Wagh Vs the Tahsildar and Others — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

(1)

¶2

1035-wp-6776-2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6776 OF 2021

¶4

BHIVA ONKAR WAGH

¶5

..PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE TAHSILDAR AND OTHERS

¶8

..RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr. Milind K. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. V. S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

¶10

 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
 S. G. DIGE, JJ.

¶11

^th DECEMBER, 2021.

¶12

PER COURT:-

¶13

1.The petitioner was directed to deposit measurement fees
under letter dated 02.12.2021. The Deputy Superintendent of Land
Records has filed affidavit to that effect. The Tahsildar has also filed
affidavit to the effect that, he has redirected respondent no.3 for
measurement of Gut No.121, 122 to open Shiv Road and on receipt of
measurement fees the said exercise would be done.

¶14

2.Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for petitioner submits
that, he is ready to pay the measurement fees.

¶15

3.The petitioner shall pay the measurement fees as
required for the measurement within a period of 15 days from today.
Thereafter, the measurement shall be carried out in accordance with
law and by adhering to the procedure as laid down under the statute
and rule.

¶16

(2) 1035-wp-6776-2021

¶17

4.It is made clear that, we have not considered the merits
of contentions of either of the parties. It is open for the parties to
take up appropriate proceeding before the appropriate authority if
any orders adverse to their interest are passed.

¶18

5. Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

 (S. G. DIGE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶20

Devendra/December-2021

Bhiva Onkar Wagh v. the Tahsildar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhiva Onkar Wagh v. the Tahsildar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundarabai Namdeo Kakade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rahul Madhavrao Kiwande Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Dnyaneshwar Nivrutti Talpade Vs Hiraman Chindhu Tayade

Ashabai Navnath Madake Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dharmsing Ranjansing Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Sanjay Dattatraya Joshi Vs Sanjay Bankar and Others