Petitioner withdrew the writ petition by written instruction. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1024-wp-5578-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5578 OF 2021
DHARMSING RANJANSING PATIL
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Ms. A. M. Bhange h/f Mr. Anandsingh Bayas, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATED : 15th DECEMBER, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
petitioner has given written instruction to withdraw the writ petition.
2.The said communication is placed on record and marked
‘X’ for identification.
3.In view of the request made, the writ petition is dismissed
as withdrawn. No costs.
Devendra/December-2021
Dharsing Ranjansing Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court