This court dismissed the present contempt petition held untenable. The court observed there was no prior order in favour of the petitioner that could be said to have been violated. No costs were awarded.
Contempt petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 CONT. PETITION NO.694 OF 2021
IN WP/1649/2021
DNYANESHWAR NIVRUTTI TALPADE
VERSUS
HIRAMAN CHINDHU TAYADE
Mr. Avinash Phad, Advocate h/f. Mr. B.S. Deshmukh,
Advocate for the Petitioner
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 14-12-2021
PER COURT :
1.We have heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner.
On 29-01-2021 we had issued notice and directed to maintain the
status-quo. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the
original writ petitioner in Writ Petition No.1649 of 2021 is misusing
the order of the Court and interfering with the work of the petitioner.
2.There was no order in favour of the petitioner that can be said
to have been violated. In view of that, the contempt petition would
not be tenable. In case, the petitioner has cause of action, the
petitioner may initiate appropriate proceedings.
Gajanan
.. 2 ..
3. The Contempt Petition as such is dismissed. No costs.
( S. G. DIGE ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
...
Gajanan
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is tenable in absence of an order in favour of the petitioner that was violated.
Whether the petitioner by misuse of order is interfering with the work of the petitioner.
If the petitioner has cause of action, whether appropriate proceedings may be initiated.
DNYANESHWAR NIVRUTTI TALPADE
HIRAMAN CHINDHU TAYADE
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court