In a contempt petition, the court accepted that defects in a proposal had been cured and submitted. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
980 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.295 OF 2021
IN WP/6197/2018
KARBHARI BHIMA VAIDYA AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Nandkishor J. Pahune Patil
AGP for Respondent / State : Mr S.G. Karlekar
Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr B.R. Survase
…
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 14-07-2021
PER COURT : -
1.Mr Survase, learned Counsel for Respondent No.4
submits that, on 09-7-2021 the compliance has been made and the
defects in the proposal have been cured and submitted to the
Collector. The statement is accepted.
2.In light of the aforesaid statement, the Contempt Petition
is disposed of.
[ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ]
JUDGE JUDGE
Gajanan
Karbhari Bhima Vaidya and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S.V. Gangapurwala
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court