The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition after noting that the relief was sought solely against respondents 2 & 3, against whom the petition had already been dismissed via a prior order dated 04.11.2020. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
958 wp 6752-20.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
958 WRIT PETITION NO.6752 OF 2020
ASHA GOVINDRAO JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Additional GP for Respondent No.1: Mrs. M.A. Deshpande
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 6th JANUARY , 2021.
PER COURT :
. Writ petition is already dismissed against respondent Nos.2 & 3 as per the order dated 04.11.2020. It appears that steps are
not taken by the petitioner. The relief is sought as against respondent Nos.2 & 3 only in the writ petition.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vsm/-
Asha Govindrao Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
