This one-line order notes that candidates withdrew nominations, no election arose, and the writ petition was disposed without costs. No legal principle is enunciated.
Writ petition disposed, no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 944-WP-82-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 82 OF 2021
Bhushan Baburao Patil and Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr R.R. Bangar, Advocate holding for Mr A.G. Talhar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1/State Mr A.B. Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 5th JANUARY, 2021
PER COURT :
[ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
mta
Bhushan Baburao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
