Petitioner filed the writ petition but submitted its purpose has been served. The court disposed of the petition without any costs.
Writ petition disposed of with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
954 wp 6680-20.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
954 WRIT PETITION NO.6680 OF 2020
ASHOK BUTA BAVISKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. D. R. Irale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 6th JANUARY , 2021.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of the writ petition is served.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vsm/-
Ashok Buta Baviskar
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S.V.Gangapurwala
Shrikant D.Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
