Allowed

Pratiksha Sainath Patodekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC16 Dec 2021WP/5558/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that prestation of validity certificates to the petitioner's paternal uncle and aunt, combined with majority favorable entries, mandates the Committee to issue a validity certificate to the petitioners as 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe, subject to the result of reopened proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Respondent-Committee to issue validity certificate to the petitioners as 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe, subject to the Committee's decision in reopened proceedings of the subs

Pratiksha Sainath Patodekar Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

.. 1 ..

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

1070 WRIT PETITION NO.5558 OF 2021

¶4

PRATIKSHA SAINATH PATODEKAR .. Petitioner

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .. Respondents ...

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.5565 OF 2021

¶9

PRAGATI SAINATH PATODEKAR .. Petitioner VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS .. Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.5575 OF 2021

¶12

AAKANKSHA BABADAS PATODEKAR .. Petitioner VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS .. Respondents

¶13

In all the matters :

¶14

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. S.K. Tambe

¶15

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ. DATE : 16-12-2021

¶16

PER COURT :

¶17

The caste claims of the petitioners as “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe are invalidated. The petitioners in Writ Petition bearing Nos. 5558 of 2021 and 5565 of 2021 are real sisters, whereas

¶18

Gajanan

¶19

.. 2 ..

¶20

the petitioner in Writ Petition bearing No.5575 of 2021 is the daughter of the real paternal uncle of the petitioners in other writ petitions.

¶21

It is submitted that the father of the petitioner in Writ Petition bearing No.5575 of 2021 and real uncle of the other petitioners are issued with the validity certificates of “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe. The real paternal aunt of the petitioners namely Pramila is also issued with the validity certificate of “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled

¶22

Tribe. The vigilance was conducted.

¶23

Validity certificate is issued to Babadas i.e. the father of the petitioner in Writ Petition bearing No.5575 of 2021 and the documents said to be adverse were the subject matter of consideration in his case. His claim was initially invalidated. Thereafter writ petition was filed by him. This Court remanded the matter to the Committee by setting aside the judgment of the Committee. After remand of the matter to the Committee, the Committee issued validity certificate to him. The contra entries which the respondents contend were also the subject matter of consideration in the case of Babadas

¶24

Gajanan

¶25

.. 3 ..

¶26

Learned AGP submits that there are contra entries on record. In relevant record, the caste of the great grandfather’s of the petitioner’s is recorded as Koli. The same is a contra entry. The other contra entry also appears. The petitioners have failed in the affinity test. The petitioners do not come from the area where the persons of “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe reside.

¶27

Upon perusal of the vigilance report in case of Babadas, it transpires that majority entries were the subject matter of consideration. Even the contra entry was considered by the Committee and thereafter validity was issued. The pre-constitutional documents in the name of the grandfather of the petitioner show caste recorded as “Mahadev Koli”. The same was verified by the vigilance in the case of the father of the petitioner and no doubt was raised. The show cause notice appears to be issued to Babadas and the real aunt of the petitioners.

¶28

In light of the validity issued to Babadas and also the real paternal aunt of the petitioners and that the majority entries were the subject matter of consideration before the Committee while issuing validity to Babadas, we pass the following order :

Gajanan

.. 4 ..

ORDER

(i) The Respondent - Committee shall issue validity certificate to the petitioners as “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe. The said certificate shall be subject to the decision that would be taken by the Committee in the proceedings reopened for the validity holders, relied by the petitioners.

¶33

(ii) Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶34

( S. G. DIGE ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE ...

¶35

Gajanan

Pratiksha Sainath Patodekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratiksha Sainath Patodekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashabai Navnath Madake Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhiva Onkar Wagh Vs the Tahsildar and Others

Dharmsing Ranjansing Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Pragati Sainath Patodekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aakanksha Babadas Patodekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Chandrashekhar Vinayak Dandage Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others