Dismissed

Anandi Atmanand Saraswati Alias Rangnath Maharaj Vishranti Math Navha Thr Its Vice President v. the Assistant Charity Commissioner Jalna

Bombay HC23 Mar 2021WP/5135/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the pendency of a change report approval application. The High Court directed the respondent to decide the application in tune with Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act within the stipulated time and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Assistant Charity Commissioner to pass orders in tune with the proviso to Sub-section 2 of Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act and decide the pending application.

Anandi Atmanand Saraswati Alias Rangnath Maharaj… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

969-wp-5135-2021

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 5135 OF 2021

¶5

Anandi Atmanand Saraswati alias
Rangnath Maharaj Vishranthi Math
Navha, Tq. & Dist. Jalna,
Through its Vice President,
Arun S/o Ambadas Ingole

¶6

... Petitioner.

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Assistant Charity Commissioner,
Jalna... Respondent.

¶9

Ms. P.S. Talekar, Advocate i/b Talekar and Associates, for the
Petitioner.

¶10

Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondent - Sole.

¶11

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 23^rd MARCH, 2021

¶12

PER COURT:-

¶13

1. Ms. Talekar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶14

change report is pending with the respondent since one year, the
same is not yet decided.

¶15

2.It appears that the petitioner has already made the application
(Page No.108) for approval / acceptance of the change report. The

¶16

said application, it appears, would be in tune with the amended
provisions of Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. It is for

¶17

1 of 2

¶18

969-wp-5135-2021 2

¶19

the respondent to take the decision upon it within the stipulation as
provided under Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act.

¶20

3.The respondent shall pass the orders in tune with proviso to
Sub-section 2 of Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The
petitioner shall prosecute the said application and the Assistant
Charity Commissioner shall decide it in accordance with law as per
above referred provisions.

¶21

4. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE

¶23

S.P. Rane

¶24

2 of 2

Anandi Atmanand Saraswati Alias Rangnath Maharaj Vishranti Math Navha Thr Its Vice President v. the Assistant Charity Commissioner Jalna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandi Atmanand Saraswati Alias Rangnath Maharaj Vishranti Math Navha Thr Its Vice President v. the Assistant Charity Commissioner Jalna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khandu Rambhau Raut and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Rajesh Babu Chinchane Alias Rajesh Balu Wallanna Basu Vs the Union of India and Another

Shankarrao Mohanrao Pawar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others

Mandakini Ankushrao Thote Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Collector Aurangabad and Others

Imran Mazhar Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Priti Shatrughnna Gandle Vs the State of Maharashtra Its Secretary and Others