The petitioner sought a criminal writ petition. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's statement that the petition was infructuous because the petitioner had already been released on parole. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any substantive order on its merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
50.Cri.W.P.No.450.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.450/2021
Yogesh Natthuji Uikey Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ms Ratna Singh, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms N. R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE:07/09/2021.
1.Ms Ratna Singh, learned Counsel for the
petitioner submits that since the petitioner is already
released on parole, this petition is rendered infructuous.
2. Her statement is accepted.
3. The petition is disposed of, as infructuous.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RGurnule
Yogesh Natthuji Uikey
State of Maharashtra
Anr.
V. M. Deshpande
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court