Disposed

Vikas S/O Wasudeorao Shirbhate v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Achalpur Tq.Achalpur Dist.Amravati and Another

Bombay HC7 Sept 2021APL/846/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal application challenging quashment of an FIR, the applicant sought liberty to file a separate application under Section 482 CrPC to challenge the filed charge-sheet after the application was withdrawn. The court acceded to the request upon withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file application under Section 482 CrPC to challenge charge-sheet.

Vikas S/O Wasudeorao Shirbhate Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso… — Quashing and FIR | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

7.Cri.APL.No.846.21

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.846/2021

¶5

Vikas S/o. Wasudeorao Shirbhate Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶6

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri V. A. Kothale, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri V. A. Thakare, A.P.P. for Non-applicant/State.

¶9

CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND

¶10

AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

¶11

DATE:07/09/2021.

¶12

1.Shri V. A. Kothale, the learned Counsel for the
applicant submits that he wishes to withdraw the present
application challenging quashment of the First Information
Report in view of the statement made by the Investigating
Officer that charge-sheet is already filed.

¶13

2.He submitted that liberty be given to the
applicant to file application under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure for challenging the charge-sheet.

¶14

3. His prayer is accepted.

¶15

4.The application is disposed of, as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for.

¶16

5.It is made clear that the case of the applicant
was not heard on its own merits today by this Court.

¶17

 JUDGE

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

RGurnule

Vikas S/O Wasudeorao Shirbhate v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Achalpur Tq.Achalpur Dist.Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas S/O Wasudeorao Shirbhate v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Achalpur Tq.Achalpur Dist.Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Shriram Uikey Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kurkheda Dist.Gadchiroli

Sheikh Ramzan Sheikh Kadar Gawali and 2 Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Buldhana City, Dist. Buldhana and Another

Anand S/o Rambhau Shinde Vs State of Maha. Thr. P.S.O. Khaparkheda Police Station, Dist. Nagpur and Another

Yogesh Natthuji Uikey (C-4866) Vs the State of Mah Thr, D.Ig. Prison (East) Nagpur and Another

Rajkumar S/O Onkarrao Dabhade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso , Police Station Walgaon, Dist. Amravati and Another

Kasam S/O Pirugawali Vs State of Mah., Thr. Pso