The High Court declined to quash an FIR under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court stayed disposal only for the petitioner to apply for discharge in the lower court.
The petition was disposed of; the petitioner was directed to apply for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3152 OF 2021
Shaileshkumar Gulabrao Kamble … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
... Respondents
Mr. Rameshwar N. Gite for the Petitioner Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 25 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :-
The Petitioner has sought to quash the FIR bearing No.I-190/2021 dated 23 March 2021 registered with the Panvel City Police Station District Navi Mumbai under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR discloses the demand and the trap panchnama.
2
to quash the FIR. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will apply for discharge before the concerned Court.
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed JYOTI by JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2021.10.26 15:38:55 +0530
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaileshkumar Gulabrao Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
