High Court bench disposed of a writ petition under Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction after the petitioner applied for discharge; the court noted the petition can be considered at an early date if discharged as per the petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed bySMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2021.10.29 GONSALVES 09:59:24 +0530
4.wp1812-18.doc
1/1
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1812 OF 2018
Olav Peter D’Souza @ Olav Cecil D’Souza .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Niranjan Mogre, a/w. Mr. Siddhesh S. Borkar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.R. Yagnik, A.P.P., for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL JJ.
DATE : 25 OCTOBER 2021.
P.C:-
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will apply for discharge and prays that if the application is filed considering the fact that the Petitioner is a student, the concerned Court shall take up the application for discharge at an early date. If the application is filed for a discharge, the concerned Court will consider taking it up at an early date subject of course to take up at an early date is beyond consideration. In view of this, the petition is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
Olav Peter D’Souza @ Olav Cecil D’Souza
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
