Application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for default was considered. The High Court recalled the dismissal order due to an unconditional apology and restored the writ petition after finding the reasons for default unacceptable.
The order dismissing the writ petition is recalled and the writ petition is restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2021.10.28 GONSALVES 14:51:31 +0530
14.ia1112-20.doc
1/1
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1112 OF 2020 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4149 OF 2018
Sanjay Ramchandra Shirke And Ors. v/s.
.. Applicants
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Mohit R. Salvi, for the Applicants.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL JJ.
DATE : 25 OCTOBER 2021.
P.C:-
Heard learned Counsel for the Applicants. This is an application for restoration of the writ petition, which is dismissed for default. Though none of the reasons given in the application why the Applicants could not keep track of the writ petition are acceptable in view of various electronic facilities provided to the Applicants, since the learned Counsel for the Applicants has tendered unconditional apology, the order dismissing the writ petition is recalled and the writ petition is restored. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
