Writ petition filed by petitioners against SEBI was disposed of by the Bombay High Court. The court observed that the grievance was redressed via a letter from the Respondent, leading the petitioners to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1_WP2842_04.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2842 OF 2004
B. M. Gandhi Securities Pvt. Ltd. and others Vs. Security Exchange Board of India and another
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Mr. Chintan Y. Shah for Petitioners.
Mr. Abhiraj Arora a/w. Mr. Karthik Narayan i/b. Economic Laws Practice for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
P.C. :-
Heard Mr. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Arora, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
(UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
Minal Parab
MINALSANDIP Digitally signedby MINALSANDIP PARABDate: PARAB 2021.09.2814:08:37 +0530
1/1
B. M. Gandhi Securities Pvt. Ltd. and others
Security Exchange Board of India and another
Ujjal Bhuyan
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
