Petitioner sought a writ direction for expeditious adjudication of his pending divorce petition in the Civil Court. The High Court declined to issue such a direction but advised the Petitioner to move the Civil Court directly to seek a ruling on delay.
Direction to issue a writ for expeditious adjudication was refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hcs
1/2
6.w6065.21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6065 OF 2021
Akshar Krishnakumar Biyani … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr.Gagan Chhabra with Tahir Prande i/b Tahir Prande for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P.Kadam AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN AND MADHAV JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2021.
P.C:-
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
hcs
6.w6065.21.doc
2/2
[MADHAV JAMDAR, J.]
[UJJAL BHUYAN, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the Civil Court to expeditiously adjudicate a pending divorce petition filed before it.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Akshar Krishnakumar Biyani
State of Maharashtra
Ujjal Bhuyan
Madhav Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
