Disposed

Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association Thro.Secretary Rajendra Y. Palkar v. Union of India Throu. Minnistry of Youth Affairs and Sport Department of Sports

Bombay HC27 Sept 2021IA/2502/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Applicant to submit a list of participants for specified National Aquatic Championships to Respondent No.5 within seven days as an interim measure, subject to eligibility criteria, before disposing of the interim application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to submit a list of participants for the Glenmark 37th Sub-Junior, 47th Junior, and 74th Senior National Aquatic Championships 2021 to Respondent No.5 within seven days.

Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association Thro.Secretary Rajendra Y. Palkar Vs Union of India Throu. Minnistry of Youth Affairs and Sport Department of Sports — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

hcs

1/2

16.ia2502.21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2502 OF 2021 IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.5892 OF 2021

¶7

Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association

¶8

… Applicant

¶9

V/s. Union of India & Ors. … Respondents

¶10

Mr.R.M.Nakhwa with Mr.S.S.Jinsiwale for the Applicant/Petitioner.

¶11

Mr.Aditya Thakkar with Mr.D.P.Singh for Union of India.

¶12

Mr.S.L.Babar AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 7.

¶13

Ms.Sapna Chauhan for Respondent No.3.

¶14

Mr.Rashmin Khandekar with Anusha Guthi and Tvishi Pant i/b Keystone for Respondent Nos.6 and 11.

¶15

CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN AND MADHAV JAMDAR, JJ.

¶16

DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2021.

¶17

P.C:-

¶18

Heard learned Counsel for parties.

¶19

After hearing the matter at some length we direct as an interim measure that the applicant – Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association, shall submit a list of participants for the Glenmark 37th Sub-Junior, 47th Junior National Aquatic Championships 2021 and 74th Senior National Aquatic Championships 2021 to Respondent No.5 within seven days from today whereafter Respondent No.5 shall allow them to

hcs

2/2

16.ia2502.21.doc

participate in those competitions subject to eligibility.

¶24

We have passed this order having considered the reasons given by a learned Single Judge of this Court in the order dated 4/06/2019 which we extract hereunder :

¶25

“11. In my opinion, considering the fact situation, any interference in the order passed by the trial Court would amount to defeating the object of promoting the swimming activities and depriving the participants from competing at the National level only because of disputes between the appellant No.1 and respondent No.1. For all these reasons, I do not find this is a fit case to interfere with the interim order pending the Notice of Motion before the trial Court.”

¶26

Interim Application is disposed of.

¶27

[MADHAV JAMDAR, J.]

¶28

[UJJAL BHUYAN, J.]

Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association Thro.Secretary Rajendra Y. Palkar v. Union of India Throu. Minnistry of Youth Affairs and Sport Department of Sports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra State Amateur Aquatic Association Thro.Secretary Rajendra Y. Palkar v. Union of India Throu. Minnistry of Youth Affairs and Sport Department of Sports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punjabrao Appasaheb Pol Vs the Assistant Registrar and Ors.

Xyz Vs the Dean of B.J Government Medical College Ans Sasson Hospital Pune

Punjabrao Appasaheb Pol Vs the Assistant Registrar and Ors.

Xyz Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Anr.

Haidry Jama Masjid Trust Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Xyz Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Anr.