Petitioner sought to quash FIR and criminal case. Bench declined writ jurisdiction as proceedings were already concluded with discharge rejected and charges framed in 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.WP 28.21.doc
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 28 OF 2021
Sushant Tapan Pore … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
... Respondent
Mr. R.G. Gadgil a/w. Ms. Tejashree Panchal for the Petitioner Mr. S.R.Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 21 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :-
This Petition filed on 2 January 2021 seeks to quash the FIR No.3 of 2008 and the Criminal Case No. 304/PW/2008 filed at the V.P. Road Police Station, pending before the 4th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Girgaum, Mumbai.
17.WP 28.21.doc
2
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
JYOTI Digitally signedby JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2021.10.25 PAWAR 11:35:13 +0530
Sushant Tapan Pore
The State of Maharashtra
Nitindar Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
