Petitioner sought leave to withdraw review petition requesting extension of time limit for approaching Appellate Authority. Court dismissed review as withdrawn but granted extension of time till September 8, 2021.
Time limit to pursue legal remedy extended till September 8, 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by PRASHANT PRASHANT VILAS VILAS RANE RANE Date: 2021.08.25 20:39:06 +0530
P.V.Rane 10rpw50-21.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.50 OF 2021 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8051 OF 2019
Sharad S.Pente … Petitioner vs. Union of India & Ors … Respondents
Mr.Sharad S.Pente, Petitioner-in-person present.
Mr.Sumit Kate i/b. Dr.Uday P.Warunjikar, Amicus Curiae.
Mr.Ashutosh R.Gole with Mr.Neel Helekar with Mr.Kanhaiya S.Yadav, for Respondent No.1-Union of India.
C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2021
PC :
1. After hearing progressed to some length, the petitioner appearing in person seeks leave to withdraw this review petition. He, however, submits that the period stipulated by the order dated July 12, 2021 under review for approaching the Appellate Authority or the Tribunal, as the case may be,
may be suitably extended in order to enable him pursue such
remedy as he may elect.
1
10rpw50-21.docx
2. The review petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs.
3. However, the time limit to pursue legal remedy stipulated by the order dated July 12, 2021 stands extended till September 8, 2021.
Sharad S. Pente
Union of India
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court