Dismissed
Dattaram Hari Pawar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCREVN/381/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1. REVN.381.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2018
Dattaram Hari Pawar & Anr. ….. Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
None for the Applicants. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATE : 1 MARCH 2021.
P. C. :
The Applicants and their counsel were absent on the last date of hearing and the matter was kept for dismissal. In absence of the Applicants Revision Application is disposed of.
[SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.]
R. V. Patil
1/1
Dattaram Hari Pawar & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Surendra P. Tavade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court