High Court criminal court disposed of a revision application on the ground that the parties had settled their dispute amicably.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.REVN.94.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVISION APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2014
Mr. Habibulla Kalesha Shaikh & Ors.
…..Applicants
vs.
Mrs. Shakeela @ Joha Habibulla Shaikh & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Vishal L. Kotekar for the Applicants.
Mr. Ashutosh Hasija i/by Mr. Sachin S. Punde for Respondent No.1. Smt. V.S. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.
DATE : 15 FEBRUARY 2021.
P. C. :
Learned counsel for the Applicants, on instructions, submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably long back. Statement accepted. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of as settled.
[SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.]
Digitally Aarti signed by Aarti G. Palkar G. Date: 2021.02.17 Palkar 13:21:03+0530
Aarti Palkar
1/1
MR. HABIBULLA KALESHA SHAIKH & ORS.
MRS. SHAKEELA @ JOHA HABIBULLA SHAIKH & ANR.
SURENDRA P. TAVADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
