In this criminal revision application challenged cheque bounce proceedings, the Applicant claimed full payment and a compromise deed. Counsel applied for withdrawal. The High Court Dismissed the application citing want of prosecution. Case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9. REVN.231.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2016
Pramodkumar Lalchand Gupta
.... Applicant
vs.
Shalikram Lalchand Gupta & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Sandeep Mishra for the Applicant. Adv. A. M. Z. Ansari, for Respondent No. 1. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATE : 1 MARCH 2021.
P. C. :
Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the entire amount of cheque is paid by the Respondent No.1. The parties have produced deed of compromise. The entire amount of cheque has been received by the Applicant. On instructions, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant intend to withdraw the present application for want of prosecution. In view of the settlement, the present Revision Application is disposed of.
[SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.]
R. V. Patil
1/1
Pramodkumar Lalchand Gupta
Shalikram Lalchand Gupta
Surendra P. Tavade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
