The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with the consent of the learned advocate for the petitioner, without costs, noting that the dismissal does not preclude further legal remedies.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-PIL-63-2021
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 63 OF 2021
Satish Banwarilal Sharma .. Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Kamlesh P. Mali for petitioner.
Mr. Ashutosh Misra for respondent nos.1 & 2 – UOI. Mr. Hiten Venegaonkar for respondent nos. 3 to 5.
C0RAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2021
PC :
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2021.10.25 19:06:22 +0530
1
Satish Banwarilal Sharma
Union of India
DIPANKAR DATTA
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
