This list order in PIL No.14/2021 disposes of the matter by relying on the earlier order passed in Writ Petition No.907/2021 dated 27th October, 2021. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil14.2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.14/2021
Santosh Gajanan Mitkari and another
..Vs..
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. Firdos Mirza, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. D.P. Thakare, Addl.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr. D.M. Kale, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Mr. Onkar Ghare, Advocate h/f Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for respondent
No.6.
CORAM :- SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATED:27.10.2021.
Heard.
2.This public interest litigation is disposed of in
terms of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition
No.907/2021 on 27th October, 2021. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Tambaskar.
Santosh Gajanan Mitkari and another
The State of Maharashtra and others
SUNIL B. SHUKRE
ANIL L. PANSARE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court