PIL regarding permission to use A-4 size paper with double-sided printing in the Bombay High Court.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; petitioner permitted to seek similar facility for district judiciary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.PIL27_2021.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 27 OF 2021
Ajinkya Mohan Udane
.. Petitioner
vs.
The Registrar General, Bombay High Court...Respondent
Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar i/b. Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde for the petitioner.
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar for the respondent.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP with Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for the State.
Mr. Y.A. Rane, Registrar (Legal) present.
CORAM :-DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
G. S. KULKARNI, J.
Date :- July 14, 2021.
PC :
1. With the issuance of Gazette notification, amending the
Appellate Side and Original Side Rules of this Court, user of A-4 size
paper with printing on both sides has been permitted. Thus, the
primary grievance voiced in this writ petition by the petitioner stands
redressed.
2.In such view of the matter, this PIL petition stands disposed of as
infructuous. No costs
3.We permit the petitioner to make suitable representation to the
Registrar General of the Court in regard to introduction of similar such
facility in the district judiciary.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajinkya Mohan Udane
The Registrar General, Bombay High Court
DIPANKAR DATTA
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court