The Chief Justice placed three PILs (Nos. 115-117 of 2021) before himself to be considered on the administrative side. No substantive decision or reasoning is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 115 OF 2021
Ranjana Pagar – Gawande and ors. …. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. V. Shridharan, Sr. Advocate a/w Ms. Madhavi Ayyappan i/b Talekar and Associates, for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
WITH
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 116 OF 2021
Dr. Abhay Thakurdas Bang and ors. …. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Rafique Dada, Sr. Advocate a/w Dr. Uday Warunjikar, Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar, Mr. Sumit Kate, Ms. Sonali Chavan, Ms. Gargi Warunjikar and Mr. Aditya Kharkar, for Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
WITH
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 117 OF 2021
Dr. Ajit Balwant Magdum and ors. …. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra ….. Respondent
1/2
Mr. Rafique Dada, Sr. Advocate a/w Dr. Uday Warunjikar, Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar, Mr. Sumit Kate, Ms. Sonali Chavan, Ms. Gargi Warunjikar and Mr. Aditya Kharkar, for Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2021
P.C. :
Place these PIL petitions before the Chief Justice on
the administrative side.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by URMILA URMILA PRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date: 2021.12.20 19:01:55 +0530
2/2
Ranjana Pagar
Dr. Abhay Thakurdas Bang
Dr. Ajit Balwant Magdum
The State of Maharashtra
DIPANKAR DATTA
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
