The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of PIL No. 68 of 2021 without any costs, accepting that the purpose of the litigation no longer subsists.
No costs. The PIL is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil 68.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 68 OF 2021
Jivan Majnu Gavit .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Majit S. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri D. R. Kale, Incharge G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Shri A. G. Talhar, A.S.G. for the Respondent No. 8.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ. DATE : 06TH JANUARY, 2022.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, purpose of the PIL does not subsist now. The PIL as such is disposed of. No costs.
[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Jan.22
Jivan Majnu Gavit
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
