In PIL no. 112 of 2021, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to explore remedies. The writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others is closed but contentions remain open.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to explore other remedies; all contentions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-PIL.112.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 112 OF 2021
Vitthal Raje Pawar and Anr. } Petitioner versus The state of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Rahul Kate i/b. Ms. Shilpa Talhar for the petitioner. Ms. R. A. Salunkhe-AGP for State.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE :- DECEMBER 17, 2021
PC :-
At the request of Mr. Kate, learned advocate for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to explore remedies in accordance with law. All contentions are left open.
SALUNKE J V
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.12.17 17:56:25 +0530
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Vitthal Raje Pawar and Anr.
The state of Maharashtra and Ors.
Dipankar Datta
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
