Reena Sunil Anthony and Anr. Vs the Icici and Anr.

2. Mr. Nikalje, learned advocate for the respondent no. 1 submits that the loan account has been settled and that nodues certificate has been issued in favour of the petitioners. He also submits that since an order under section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been passed by the relevant District Magistrate, a request would be made by the respondent no. 1 to such magistrate not to enforce his order.

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

J.V.Salunke,PS

¶15

19-WP.4861.2021

¶16

3. The documents produced by Mr. Nikalje are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.

¶17

4. Having looked into the said documents, we are satisfied that nothing survives for decision on this writ petition. The same stands disposed of. No costs.

¶18

5. We, however, grant liberty to the petitioners to apply if any other issue raised in the writ petition is required to be addressed.

¶19

(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶20

Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2021.12.17 18:59:53 +0530

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

J.V.Salunke,PS

Reena Sunil Anthony and Anr. v. the Icici and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reena Sunil Anthony and Anr. v. the Icici and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms. Vimla T. Nainani and Anr. Vs Mr. Damodar Gulabrai Belani (Since Deceased Throuhg Lrs. and Anr.

Vinayak Narhar Joshi Decd Thru Lhr Vs M/S Pore Brothers and Anr.

Vaibhav S. Kapur Vs Suresh Gangaram Lohote and Ors.

Mehta Infocomm and Anr. Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) Directorate of Revenue Initelligence and Ors.

Shri. Gulab Abdulrajjak Mulla (Mujawar ) vs Shri. Noormohamad Chandsaheb Mulla and Ors.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Iii Vs P D Impex and 1 Ors.