Petitioner was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was consequently disposed of without costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904.WPNo.20452017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2045 OF 2017
Ramesh Gurdasmal Chandiramani ... Petitioner versus The Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
….. Ms.Hitisha R. Patel i/b. Mr.Ravindra V. Sankpal & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- FEBRURY 18, 2021
PC :
Digitally signed by Raju Raju D.Gaikwad D. GaikwadDate:2021.02.18 14:28:23 +0530
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Ramesh Gurdasmal Chandiramani
The Union of India
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
