This is a note on a criminal revision application where the prosecutor waived notice. The order does not dispose of the matter and no substantive decision or principle is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-CRIR-653-2021.DOC
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 653 OF 2021 (FILING)
PRASANNA SHRIKANT …APPLICANT AKHADKAR Versus
1.URBAN CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD., REP. BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER, …RESPONDENTS TUKARAM GAUDE AND ANR
Mr. Rohan Desai, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. G. Nagvenkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 29th September 2021
P.C.
1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.
2. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 07.10.2021.
3. Mr. Nagvenkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, waives notice on behalf of the Respondent no.2-State.
ANDREZA
PEREIRA
Digitally signed by ANDREZA PEREIRA Date: 2021.09.29 15:55:03 +05'30'
MANISH PITALE, J.
Page 1 of 1 29th September 2021
PRASANNA SHRIKANT AKHADKAR
URBAN CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
