Dattaram Chopdekar (Dec) Thr. His Lrs. v. Sharayu Amonkar (Dec) Thr. Her Lrs.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an interim application, the applicant sought restraint against respondents to prevent dispossession of suit premises despite an existing interim order. The court, noting counsel for respondents needed time for instructions, listed the matter for further consideration and granted an ad interim direction restraining respondents from dispossessing the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Ad interim direction that respondents shall not in any manner directly or indirectly seek to dispossess the applicant from suit premises until the next date of listing.