Dismissed

Naseem Khan Hamid Khan Pathan and Another v. Prakash Rajam Totawar and Others

Bombay HC17 Feb 2021CAW/306/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Civil Application wherein applicants sought directions to restrain disturbances in an upcoming yearly Urus Programme. The court held the prayer was vague and such matters fall within police jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Application was disposed of without outlining any directions to the respondents.

Naseem Khan Hamid Khan Pathan and Another v. Prakash Rajam Totawar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naseem Khan Hamid Khan Pathan and Another v. Prakash Rajam Totawar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Painganga Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Yeotmal Thr. President Suresh Bhama Reddy Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Geeta Mahendra Kadu and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Bal Gangadhar Tilak Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, through Its Secretary, Vilas Sheshrao Mamulkar Vs the Stte of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department

Vishnu S/O Motiram Raut and Others Vs the Government of India Thr. Chief Secretary, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Others

Rahul S/O Ramchand Kishnani and Another Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Dept.) and Others

Babulal Mahadeorao Badwaik Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Others