Vishnu S/O Motiram Raut and Others Vs the Government of India Thr. Chief Secretary, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Others

This Petition is filed by eleven villagers stated to be residing within the jurisdiction of Melghat Tiger Reserve. The Petitioners have challenged the Government Resolution dated 03 November 2012 whereby rehabilitation policy of the villagers from the Tiger Reserve was evolved by the State of Maharashtra.

¶16

The learned Incharge G.P. points out that pursuant to the said Resolution dated 03 November 2012, rehabilitations have taken place and the Petitioners, the eleven individuals, have not given any particulars of

¶17

SMGate

¶18

2

¶19

wp 1593.2020.odt

¶20

their own and the Petitioners cannot be said to be representing all the villagers.

¶21

The Government Resolution dated 03 November 2012 was issued almost a decade ago. As pointed out by the learned Incharge G.P., rehabilitation has taken place.

¶22

This Petition is neither filed in representative capacity nor is a Public Interest Litigation, therefore, the Petitioners will have to plead their particulars as to their lands; what steps as against them were taken pursuant to the said policy and why they are not accepting the said Policy/ Resolution.

¶23

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that a fresh Petitions will be filed pleading particulars of each of the Petitioners and as to why they are not accepting the said Policy/Resolution.

¶24

The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

¶25

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶26

SMGate

Vishnu S/O Motiram Raut and Others v. the Government of India Thr. Chief Secretary, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu S/O Motiram Raut and Others v. the Government of India Thr. Chief Secretary, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Painganga Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Yeotmal Thr. President Suresh Bhama Reddy Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Geeta Mahendra Kadu and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Bal Gangadhar Tilak Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, through Its Secretary, Vilas Sheshrao Mamulkar Vs the Stte of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department

Rahul S/O Ramchand Kishnani and Another Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Dept.) and Others

Babulal Mahadeorao Badwaik Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Others

Sou. Suwarnkala W/O Janardan Khatod Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thermal Power Energy Depatment, Mumbai and Others