Babulal Mahadeorao Badwaik Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Others

The Petitioner has sought a direction to the Respondents to remove the alleged encroachment made by the Respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7 on the public land as stated in the Petition.

¶14

The Petitioner does not own the land on which alleged encroachment is made. In the Petition it is stated that the Petitioner’s easement of right is blocked by the structure. The Petitioner has not filed a civil suit on that count but has invoked a public law remedy. It is stated in the Petition itself that the Respondents have filed a Regular Civil Suit No. 204/2016 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bhandara. It appears that an ex parte ad interim order is granted on 23 December

¶15

SMGate

¶16

2 wp 523.2021.odt

¶17

The learned Counsel has submitted that injunction was only till the appearance of the Defendants and the order stands automatically vacated upon appearance. However, no further orders are placed on record.

¶18

Even otherwise, since the Civil Court has already seized of the dispute wherein the Petitioner can raise all contentions and we do not deem it necessary to entertain the Petition on the same subject. Appropriate course of action would be that the Petitioner files an Application for intervention in Regular Civil Suit No. 204/2016.

¶19

With this observation, Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶20

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]

¶21

[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶22

SMGate

Babulal Mahadeorao Badwaik v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Babulal Mahadeorao Badwaik v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Painganga Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Yeotmal Thr. President Suresh Bhama Reddy Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Geeta Mahendra Kadu and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Bal Gangadhar Tilak Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, through Its Secretary, Vilas Sheshrao Mamulkar Vs the Stte of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department

Vishnu S/O Motiram Raut and Others Vs the Government of India Thr. Chief Secretary, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Others

Rahul S/O Ramchand Kishnani and Another Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Dept.) and Others

Sou. Suwarnkala W/O Janardan Khatod Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thermal Power Energy Depatment, Mumbai and Others