Roshan Harishchandra Bhuvad v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench permitted withdrawal of bail application citing statutory right to appeal under SC/ST Act, reserving liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 1 BA 918-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.918 OF 2021
Roshan Harishchandra Bhuvad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Adv Dhanalakshmi Iyer for the applicant. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 27th AUGUST, 2021
P.C:-
1 Learned counsel for the applicant seek withdrawal of the application since she is desirous of instituting a proper Appeal in view of the statutory provision permitting an appeal to be filed since the offence invoke under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2 Application is permitted to be withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J
Tilak
Roshan Harishchandra Bhuvad
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court