An interlocutory order granting interim bail to two applicants under anticipatory bail provisions. The court made the interim protection absolute since cooperation was rendered and investigation completed, without custody interrogation.
The interim protection granted by the earlier order dated 22/01/2020 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed JAYARAJANANJAKULATHNAIR by JAYARAJANANJAKULATHNAIRDate: 2021.08.26 17:59:07 +0530
1/2 06 ABA-132.20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.132 OF 2020
Nishikant Krushnarao More .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2020
Sukhchain Singh Bath .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
… Mr. Ashok Mundargi with Mr. Kishor D. Walanju for the Applicant.
Ms. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2021.
P.C:-
AJN
2/2 06 ABA-132.20.odt
the Applicant is not necessary, the Applicant was admitted to interim protection.
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
AJN
Nishikant Krushnarao More
Sukhchain Singh Bath
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
