The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a bail application as infructuous because the applicant had not appeared in court despite multiple listings since 2019.
Bail application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-Ba-1230-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1230 OF 2019
Mahendra Ashok Gaikwad … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 8th SEPTEMBER, 2021.
PER COURT:
.Learned APP on instructions submits that the applicant
is on bail. This application is pending since 2019. Whenever the
application is listed on board, none had appeared for the applicant.
In view of the submission of learned APP, the application has
become infructuous and stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2021.09.09 12:00:12 +0530
1 of 1
Sajakali Jamadar
Mahendra Ashok Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court